On 3/15/2016 2:56 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Might be related to aacenc? But yes, we need to know overall speed gain of > some useful end user feature before/after this.
[13:42] <@atomnuker> well, AAC just requires the random numbers to be only somewhat random [13:43] <@atomnuker> you could probably replace the random numbers with just a static table of somewhat random numbers [13:43] <@atomnuker> and that probably won't really change much in terms of the output quality [13:43] <@atomnuker> though an integer RNG might be useful for some things I have in mind [13:44] <@Daemon404> we do have one. but it is not 64bit [13:44] <@atomnuker> yeah, a 32 bit one would be enough - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
