Le decadi 20 ventôse, an CCXXIV, Clement Boesch a écrit : > That's a good idea but downstream developers might prefer their users to > experience a memleak that random violent aborts. I would probably make it > at assert level 1.
Assert level 0 and 1 are equivalent from an API point of view: they both mean (in this case when testing value provided by the caller) that the provided value is invalid on pain of undefined behaviour. On the other hand, this was not currently true nor documented: using these functions with a destination that contains garbage is not illegal according with doxy and works currently well. Thing is, currently, users can not have a frame with garbage unless they do it on purpose: either it contains valid pointers or it is cleared. At the very least, this change would require updating the doxy accordingly. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
