On 08.03.2016, at 04:50, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Reimar Döffinger > <reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >>> Can you be more specific, and are you sure about this? >> >> Just run your favourite performance analysis tool and you'll see. >> As it is non-inlined libc code I'm fairly sure the numbers are accurate >> enough. > > I am still puzzled by the remarks; and hence asked for specific > examples. In aac code, cosf is only called for table generation, same > with cos, so still don't see why cos is relevant. Well I can see it using 5% of CPU but that's it for now. Someone will need to e.g. use a debugger or use profiling with call stack if it's not clear where it comes from. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
