Hi, On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Reimar Döffinger <reimar.doeffin...@gmx.de> wrote:
> FFmpeg currently lacks a fallback inflate algorithm > when zlib is not available. > This wouldn't be the first time we NIH'ed something, so that by itself isn't a sufficiently good reason to not use it :) We have a lot of infrastructure for it already available > though, like VLC code reading (though only in libavcodec, > not libavutil). > This is a hackish quick-and-dirty version. > It certainly is not optimized, and I would want it to > be mostly small/simple, not necessarily fast anyway > as it would at most be a fallback. > Is there interest in me cleaning up the code and > integrating it as fallback, or are you all happy > with zlib and I should drop it? Well, you skim over performance, it'd be nice to get some figures of how much faster/slower it is. Binary size may also be a factor in some situations (if zlib is included static). How often is zlib not available? I mean, afaik, it's even present on MSVC builds or iPhone/Android builds. I think we sort of have to quantify how much of an issue this really is. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel