Timo Rothenpieler <timo <at> rothenpieler.org> writes:

> So instead of
> 
> N-78885-g966eade

The continuous numbering scheme is very convenient when 
answering user questions and it reflects very well the 
(past and current) development model of FFmpeg that is 
not release-driven ...

> 
> One now gets
> 
> n3.1-dev-422-g966eade

... while I personally find this slightly ugly.

Please don't change the versioning system, Carl Eugen

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to