On 02/27/2016 09:33 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 08:42:25PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
should rawvideo AVPackets palette use data[] or sidedata, honestly i
do not know, but i dont think it makes a big difference
even supporting both, likely only adds 3-5 lines of code or so
its more a philosophical question
Not sure how much was in response to my complaints, but
i dont know either, i was just writing some kind of summary ...
if this parts was I think that misses my point, as I
agree that it doesn't matter which.
What matters though is:
The AVI demuxer creates AVPackets with palette in side data,
and the AVI muxer supports ONLY palette appended in the data.
How to fix it might be philosophical, but I think it's not
philosophical and fairly clear that that's just broken.
yes, though rawvideo stream copy is a bit tricky, especially when
its not the same container.
avi<->mov have different stride align requirements for example.
Yes, I mentioned that before, regarding the stride differences. One
question: For stream copying, the packets will travel unaltered from the
demuxer to the muxer including the side data, right? Sorry if it sounds
idiotic.
Mats
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
