On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 03:57:06PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > On 02/27/2016 03:37 PM, Mats Peterson wrote: > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >ffmpeg-devel mailing list > >ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > >http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > > > I suppose this is what you mean, Reimar. Treating the palette, if a packet > contains one at the end of the video data, as being AVPALETTE_SIZE bytes > exclusively.
Well, actually not really. If the palette is part of input frame it should be sent as side data. I am not sure where this variant comes from. It might be that it should just be written as is. Or even if the palette needs to be split it might be necessary to auto-detect the palette size via packet size - (width*height*bits per pixel)/8. But as said, I am fairly unclear on what case that code is supposed to handle. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
