On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:42:29AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > James Zern <jzern <at> google.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > James Zern <jzern <at> google.com> writes: > > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > >> > On Friday 19 February 2016 07:59:37 am James Zern wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> The decoder won't change when built on a big-endian > > >> >> platform, so I don't think this is correct. > > >> > > > >> > New patch attached. > > >> > > >> Sorry, I meant all of it, high bitdepth is no different. > > > > > > I don't understand: Do you mean that the patch is incomplete > > > and that further broken pix_fmts exist? Which ones? > > > > I meant I didn't think LE was incorrect to begin with, > > am I missing something? > > Difficult to say. > > Short answer: How can I reproduce this? > (The fact that it works fine on BE with > unpatched sources.) > > Long answer: > I was honestly very angry with myself when I saw this > code yesterday: I consider it an obvious bug that I (!) > should have seen whenever this patch was sent to the > mailing list. > I spent some time yesterday to find BE hardware and to
> compile there (and git.videolan was extremely slow at > the time and git pull tool ages) so I only tested very you can use https://github.com/FFmpeg/FFmpeg.git for pulling [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The bravest are surely those who have the clearest vision of what is before them, glory and danger alike, and yet notwithstanding go out to meet it. -- Thucydides
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
