On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:58:31PM +0100, wm4 wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:55:47 +0700 > Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:20 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:30:20 +0700 > > > Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > > > > > Possibly it happens to work for you because there are no filters with > > > much buffering and you didn't try video. > > > > > I don't mean that it will be supported by all filters. On filters with > > much buffering, probably there will be huge delay between seek command > > and their new output pts (It is tolerable). On filters which assume linear > > pts, probably it will fail. > > How is that even a reasonable argument? > > libavfilter already has enough "works in maybe 10% of all cases" > solutions.
mpeg* can contain discontinuities in the timestamps already without any seeking [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Never trust a computer, one day, it may think you are the virus. -- Compn
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel