On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 04:58:31PM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:55:47 +0700
> Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:20 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 21:30:20 +0700
> > > Muhammad Faiz <mfc...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > Possibly it happens to work for you because there are no filters with
> > > much buffering and you didn't try video.
> > >  
> > I don't mean that it will be supported by all filters. On filters with
> > much buffering, probably there will be huge delay between seek command
> > and their new output pts (It is tolerable). On filters which assume linear
> > pts, probably it will fail.
> 
> How is that even a reasonable argument?
> 
> libavfilter already has enough "works in maybe 10% of all cases"
> solutions.

mpeg* can contain discontinuities in the timestamps already without
any seeking

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Never trust a computer, one day, it may think you are the virus. -- Compn

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to