On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:41:52PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> skrev: (17 februari 2016 > 12:36:58 CET) > >On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:42:40PM +0100, Mats Peterson wrote: > >> On 02/16/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > > >> >no, that patch is left for others to decide, my oppinion is that the > >> >muxer bug must be fixed first to prevent the generation of invalid > >> >files. I wanted to look into it as you dont look into it but i dont > >> >have time now > >> > > >> > >> That's OK regarding not having time. But the reason I don't look > >> into it is that I'm afraid of messing things up. I don't have enough > >> knowledge about the details when it comes to the muxing side of > >> things. > > > >your knowledge of avi/mov muxing related to rawvideo is sufficient > >also you seem to have time and interrest in this > > > >[...] > > How do you know.
the number of mails you send need time to write and if you had something more important to do you wouldnt be so obsessed with that one patch and i know you understand the muxing side reasonable well as you stated in your mails how its supposed to work, which matches what i remember ... > And I have already observed several intricacies related to implementing > proper palette inclusion in AVI and QuickTime, that is better left to someone > else to solve, Michael. > -- > Mats Peterson > http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
