On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:45:55AM +0000, John Cox wrote: >> Hi >> >> v2 of my hevc residual patch >> >> I've fixed the fate regression >> I've split it into more pieces >> Now uses ff_clz >> Some reformating of function headers >> >> The patches can also be found on >> https://github.com/jc-kynesim/rpi-ffmpeg.git on branch >> test/ff_hevc_cabac_4 from tag ff_hevc_cabac_4_base >> >> Note that I will be going on holiday from the end of Friday (UK time) >> till the 1st Feb and will be unable to edit code or read this list >> during that period. > > applied the first 3 patches > one #endif was moved to another patch, one typo fixed > and confirmed that clz is faster
You mean faster than the builtin (which ff_clz uses)? That sounds a bit surprising, and worth investigating. > > thx > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no > further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
