On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:26:05 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >2016-01-19 13:46 GMT+01:00 John Cox <j...@kynesim.co.uk>: >> I've just done a fair bit of work on hevc_cabac decode for the Rasberry >> Pi2 and I think that the patch is generally applicable. Patch is >> attached but you may prefer to take it from git: > >This work is certainly impressive, and most people would have come >only with some of the "tricks" you used. >Although it already represents quite a bit of work, I echo others' >suggestions to have more incremental changes. > >> I have not yet run fate over it as I haven't yet finished downloading >> the samples (the internet connection here isn't wildly fast), but I have >> run it against the H265.1 conformance streams on both x86 and ARM and it >> causes no regressions. > >Your patch fails on the later fate tests linked to range extensions >(RExt sequences) on Win64. I didn't investigate why. Random thoughts: >transform_skip, cross-channel residual, some bypass-coded elements (eg >SAO).
Thanks for that - bug in my persistent rice processing. Apparently untested by the main conformance suite. Code now passes fate (x86 anyway). [snip] Regards JC _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
