On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> wm4 <nfxjfg <at> googlemail.com> writes: > > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:55:38 +1100 > > Jean-Yves Avenard <jyavenard <at> gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > One of the issues we've faced was with our reftest > > > tests, with pages creating hundreds of small video > > > elements (the test change orientation, sizes, > > > transparency and the like and check that there's > > > no regression on how things are displayed). > > > > Do I understand right that only your tests do this? > > I may have misunderstood myself but I believe the > issue actually only happens on Windows XP;-) I suppose the larger memory usage would be considered a problem too, and also can hit 32 bit boundaries even on non-XP. Anyway, as another point I would argue: - discouraging web devs from creating too many video elements, and introducing a static "reasonable" limit (maybe a dozen elements) - not using MT for very small video (MT would probably make it slower anyway) _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
