On 03.01.2016 00:16, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 02/01/16 23:46, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >> Maybe, but on the other hand there are only about a dozen or so places in >> the complete code base that would benefit from that. >> >> Do you think that's enough to justify adding another helper function? > > It makes the code easier to follow, I wouldn't be against even if it would be > for 6 =)
Actually there were already two such helpers, so unifying this makes sense. I've sent a patch series replacing this patch. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
