Hi, On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde < > gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde > >> > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde > >> >> > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> This exploits an approach based on the sieve of Eratosthenes, a > >> >> >> popular > >> >> >> method for generating prime numbers. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Tables are identical to previous ones. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Tested with FATE. Does not work yet with --enable-hardcoded-tables > >> >> >> due > >> >> >> to the union and lack of proper WRITE_ARRAY for it. Want to get > >> >> >> feedback > >> >> >> on this; if we always dynamically init it this won't need > >> >> >> addressing. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > I think you're getting ahead of yourself here. Assume for now that > >> >> > the > >> >> > hardcoded-tables feature will continue to exist for a while. > >> >> > >> >> I was referring to just this one, not to the question in general. > >> > > >> > > >> > I was also referring to this case specifically. Assume, for now, that > >> > hardcoded tables for this specific case, will continue to exist. > >> > >> Then defend it technically please. For instance, you have not > >> addressed the fundamental amortization of table init cost. > > > > > > No. It is the status quo, and remains that until it changes. That's why > it's > > called the status quo. I've encouraged you several times to have this > debate > > in the open, but you keep jumping away when that comes up. > > What is this if not "open"? Where does this "jumping away" come from? Open is an identifiable thread where people interested in that subject can participate. "[PATCH] cbrt: improve" is barely anything like that. Call it "[RFC] Disable compile-time tablegen if total cyclecount < $threshold". Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
