On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Rostislav Pehlivanov <atomnu...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with BBB (Ronald), this project claims to have the fastest decoders > available and we shouldn't sacrifice performance. Since basically the only > input of the decoder goes through the entropy decoding system occasionally > checking for overflows in a few performance sensitive parts there is worth > it, as it has been pointed out. > Also I'd like to remind people that this is an RFC and WIP. Overflow > checking and fuzzing aren't high priority yet. I wanted to know if I was > doing something horribly wrong, typos, naive code, asserts/crashes on > normal files, glitches, etc.
Definitely. I was just making some general remarks on the never ending security/performance debate; they were not meant for your patch per se. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
