On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote: > Am 23.12.2015 19:47 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajja...@mit.edu>: >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> > Am 23.12.2015 18:30 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajjanaga...@gmail.com >>: >> >> >> >> Commits 062e3e23824ba3d25594ea966d7834bcf34db49b and >> >> dd68cde28a44bbf5307d29ee6cb8ebd14985dea5 added support for erf and >> >> copysign on broken libms, and so dynaudnorm is now available on all >> >> platforms. >> >> >> >> This is user facing; hence the Changelog entry. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> >> Changelog | 1 + >> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/Changelog b/Changelog >> >> index 2b46ddb..bb29afb 100644 >> >> --- a/Changelog >> >> +++ b/Changelog >> >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ version <next>: >> >> - DXVA2-accelerated VP9 decoding >> >> - SOFAlizer: virtual binaural acoustics filter >> >> - VAAPI VP9 hwaccel >> >> +- dynaudnorm filter availability on all platforms >> >> >> >> >> >> version 2.8: >> >> -- >> >> 2.6.4 >> >> >> > >> > dynaudnorm hasnt been in any previous release, has it? IIRC its still > very >> > new itself, so no need for a change log entry IMHO. >> >> As Paul points out, it was added in 2.8. It was for this precise >> reason that I wondered about the Changelog. So is the summary that the >> patch is ok (or neutral)? In other words, does anyone oppose it? >> > > Personally I wouldn't care that much to mention it in the change log, but > its not like I would oppose it, so if Paul as the author of the filter > feels its fine, then LGTM as well.
Dropped, no real consensus on these things and since I am not much of a user of FFmpeg, I don't really know whether they obtain value from these things in the Changelog. Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
