Am 24.12.2015 23:01 schrieb "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> > wrote: > > > Also, over time I would like to cleanup the avutil/libm header: there > > are macros in places where there should really be functions, though > > Hendrik points out that in some cases there is no real alternative. At > > the moment, most of the macros are used without any justification in > > the patch notes or as comments. > > > I think it's not too far off to say that development of libm.h is largely > organic, that is, it's done based on needs and breakages until we have > something that fills our needs, but nothing that was designed beyond just > that. So, sure, if you can design it better, that would be very welcome. >
Just have to be careful not to restart that "evolution" just because some reasons may not have been documented quite clearly in the past. FATE is a start but doesn't cover everything unfortunately. I'm not sure the log2 case I mentioned is actually in any FATE system today, for example, yet we all know that every crazy case that once worked has one user out there somewhere ;) _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
