On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > lrint is at least as fast, and more accurate. > > Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> > --- > libavfilter/vf_histogram.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/libavfilter/vf_histogram.c b/libavfilter/vf_histogram.c > index 8e6f531..3f50f12 100644 > --- a/libavfilter/vf_histogram.c > +++ b/libavfilter/vf_histogram.c > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int filter_frame(AVFilterLink *inlink, AVFrame *in) > int col_height; > > if (h->levels_mode) > - col_height = round(h->level_height * (1. - > (log2(h->histogram[i] + 1) / max_hval_log))); > + col_height = lrint(h->level_height * (1. - > (log2(h->histogram[i] + 1) / max_hval_log))); > else > col_height = h->level_height - (h->histogram[i] * > (int64_t)h->level_height + max_hval - 1) / max_hval; > > -- > 2.6.4 >
pushed _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
