Hi,
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu>
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <
> gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <
> rsbul...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Hi,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde
> >>>>> > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> For systems with broken libms.
> >>>>> >> Tested with NAN, -NAN, INFINITY, -INFINITY, +/-x for regular
> double x
> >>>>> >> and
> >>>>> >> combinations of these.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> >> ---
> >>>>> >> configure | 2 +-
> >>>>> >> libavutil/libm.h | 9 +++++++++
> >>>>> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> >>>>> >> index 123d1df..7917386 100755
> >>>>> >> --- a/configure
> >>>>> >> +++ b/configure
> >>>>> >> @@ -2852,7 +2852,7 @@ cropdetect_filter_deps="gpl"
> >>>>> >> delogo_filter_deps="gpl"
> >>>>> >> deshake_filter_select="pixelutils"
> >>>>> >> drawtext_filter_deps="libfreetype"
> >>>>> >> -dynaudnorm_filter_deps="copysign erf"
> >>>>> >> +dynaudnorm_filter_deps="erf"
> >>>>> >> ebur128_filter_deps="gpl"
> >>>>> >> eq_filter_deps="gpl"
> >>>>> >> fftfilt_filter_deps="avcodec"
> >>>>> >> diff --git a/libavutil/libm.h b/libavutil/libm.h
> >>>>> >> index 6d8bd68..637de19 100644
> >>>>> >> --- a/libavutil/libm.h
> >>>>> >> +++ b/libavutil/libm.h
> >>>>> >> @@ -62,6 +62,15 @@ static av_always_inline float cbrtf(float x)
> >>>>> >> }
> >>>>> >> #endif
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> +#if !HAVE_COPYSIGN
> >>>>> >> +static av_always_inline double copysign(double x, double y)
> >>>>> >> +{
> >>>>> >> + uint64_t vx = av_double2int(x);
> >>>>> >> + uint64_t vy = av_double2int(y);
> >>>>> >> + return av_int2double((vx & 0x7fffffffffffffff) | (vy &
> >>>>> >> 0x8000000000000000));
> >>>>> >> +}
> >>>>> >> +#endif
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Don't these need type suffixes (e.g. UINT64_C(val)) on some
> systems?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe not, see
> >>>>> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/integer_literal
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That document confirms that it is indeed legal for a compiler to read
> the
> >>>> given literal on a 32bit or windows 64bit system as a 32bit max
> value, and
> >>>> your literals don't fit in 32bit.
> >>>
> >>> How, the standard clearly says that the literal will be in the type
> >>> int < unsigned int < long int < unsigned long int < long long int <
> >>> unsigned long long int, wherever it first fits, and this is also clear
> >>> from the link I sent.
> >>>
> >>> long long is at least 64 bits. I can't speak about broken
> >>> compilers/environments that lack long long.
> >>
> >> This turns out to be the heart of the matter; as usual, Microsoft's
> >> toolchain is fundamentally broken:
> >>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25626022/how-should-a-64-bit-integer-literal-be-represented-in-c
> .
> >>
> >
> > Its behavior would appear to be valid C90 on Windows, since long int
> > is 32-bit on that platform (which C90 calls for using, not long long)
>
> Yes, I meant broken wrt C99 (as seen in the link), which most of our
> platforms have and use. Basically, I meant that their C99 support is
> half-baked and broken (of course not news).
But FFmpeg isn't C99, see
https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#C-language-features
"FFmpeg is programmed in the ISO C90 language with a few additional
features from ISO C99 [..]"
Ronald
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
