On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajja...@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:55:25PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> [...]
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/libavcodec/nellymoserenc.c b/libavcodec/nellymoserenc.c
>>>> index d998dba..e6023e3 100644
>>>> --- a/libavcodec/nellymoserenc.c
>>>> +++ b/libavcodec/nellymoserenc.c
>>>> @@ -179,8 +179,15 @@ static av_cold int encode_init(AVCodecContext *avctx)
>>>>
>>>> /* Generate overlap window */
>>>> ff_init_ff_sine_windows(7);
>>>> - for (i = 0; i < POW_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
>>>> - pow_table[i] = pow(2, -i / 2048.0 - 3.0 + POW_TABLE_OFFSET);
>>>> + pow_table[0] = 1;
>>>> + pow_table[1024] = M_SQRT1_2;
>>>> + for (i = 1; i < 513; i++) {
>>>> + double tmp = exp2(-i / 2048.0);
>>>> + pow_table[i] = tmp;
>>>> + pow_table[1024-i] = M_SQRT1_2 / tmp;
>>>> + pow_table[1024+i] = tmp * M_SQRT1_2;
>>>> + pow_table[2048-i] = 0.5 / tmp;
>>>
>>> how much overall init time is gained by this ?
>>> that is time in ffmpeg main() from start to finish when just opening
>>> the file with no decoding aka ./ffmpeg -i somefile
>>
>> Don't know, all I know is cycles are unnecessarily wasted. Will put in
>> cycle numbers.
>>
>
> Here they are:
> proposed: 424160 decicycles in pow_table, 512 runs, 0 skips
> exp2 only: 1262093 decicycles in pow_table, 512 runs, 0 skips
> old: 2849085 decicycles in pow_table, 512 runs, 0 skips
>
> Thus old to exp2 is roughly 2.25x speedup, exp2 to proposed roughly 3x
> speedup, net ~ 6.7x speedup.
took Michael's comment as a general ack, so pushed with addition of a
comment and cycle numbers.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
