On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:58:46PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 14.12.2015 00:51, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 09:56:06PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> Also correct the check to reject log < 7, because UPDATE_CACHE only > >> guarantees 25 meaningful bits. > >> > >> This fixes undefined behavior: > >> runtime error: shift exponent is negative > >> > >> Testing with START/STOP timers in get_ue_golomb, one for the first > >> branch (A) and one for the second (B), shows that there is practically no > >> slowdown, e.g. for the cavs decoder: > >> > >> With the check in the B branch: > >> 629 decicycles in get_ue_golomb B, 4194260 runs, 44 skips > >> 433 decicycles in get_ue_golomb A,268434102 runs, 1354 skips > >> > >> Without the check: > >> 624 decicycles in get_ue_golomb B, 4194273 runs, 31 skips > >> 433 decicycles in get_ue_golomb A,268434203 runs, 1253 skips > >> > >> Since the B branch is executed far less often than the A branch, this > >> change is negligible, even more so for the h264 decoder, where the ratio > >> B/A is a lot smaller. > >> > >> Fixes: mozilla bug 1229208 > >> Fixes: > >> fbeb8b2c7c996e9b91c6b1af319d7ebc/asan_heap-oob_195450f_2743_e8856ece4579ea486670be2b236099a0.bit > >> > >> Found-by: Tyson Smith > >> Found-by: Mateusz "j00ru" Jurczyk and Gynvael Coldwind > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> > >> --- > >> > >> Note that I just copied the "Fixes:" lines from Michael's patch, but > >> actually > >> I don't know what mozilla bug 1229208 is about, as it seems not to be > >> public. > >> Also I don't have the mentioned sample, but the patch fixes more than 1000 > >> of my fuzzed samples that triggered this ubsan error, so I'm confident the > >> mentioned one is also fixed. > > > > actually i think the bug number is > > "Bug 1230239 - FFMPEG: shift exponent is negative in [@get_ue_golomb] " > > I changed the bug number accordingly, > > > patch should be ok > > and pushed the patch. > > > and iam also not happy about the bugs being non public > > i tried unchecking "Security-Sensitive Media Bug" but i seem not to > > have the power to do that but its quite possibly iam doing something > > wrong > > Maybe add a comment requesting the bug to be made public, so that > someone who has that power can do it.
i think i suggested already in a few of the bugs that they are probably not security relevant [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel