What is completely unacceptable? That I provide an improved patch that doesn't call mov.c? That was what another developer here complained about, so I fixed that. And I said before, I'm not going to "learn" how to use the messy Git system. Take it or leave it. Regarding "the original author", most of the old patch has been modified by me.
Mats -- Mats Peterson http://matsp888.no-ip.org/~mats/ From: Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 12:42 PM Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] matroskadec.c: Handle palettized QuickTime video properly On Friday 11 December 2015 12:32:13 pm Mats Peterson wrote: > OK, here is an improved version of my previous patch of > matroskadec.c that manages the palette itself without calling > code in mov.c. I have borrowed some code from it This is completely unacceptable afaict. Unrelated: It is a mystery to me how using the function that allows parsing stsd atoms to parse an stsd atom can be called a "hack", even more so when this is done in existing code. Please stop top-posting here and please send separate patches made with git format-patch for separate issues. Finally, please try to attribute patches you send here to the original author, thank you. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
