On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:53:58AM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:22:10AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:13:11PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> > > Le septidi 17 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Clement Boesch a écrit :
> >> > > > From: Clément Bœsch <clem...@stupeflix.com>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---
> >> > > > libavcodec/frame_thread_encoder.c | 9 +--------
> >> > > > libavcodec/pthread_frame.c | 10 ++--------
> >> > > > libavcodec/utils.c | 9 +--------
> >> > > > libavcodec/vp8.h | 9 +--------
> >> > > > libavutil/opencl.c | 10 +---------
> >> > > > libavutil/threadmessage.c | 12 +-----------
> >> > > > 6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >> > >
> >> > > No objection from me.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > Will push soon
> >> >
> >> > > Nit: "avutil, avcodec:" or "lavu, lavc:" instead of "avutil: avcodec:".
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > sure.
> >> >
> >> > BTW, i think we should decide on av{util,codec,...} vs lav[ufc...] and
> >> > stick with it. This inconsistency is triggering my mild OCD.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hahahahaha :-D.
> >>
> >> Why don't you bofh us and tell us what to do and we'll follow? I nominate
> >> you to be the review-bully and ensure people follow your rule.
> >>
> >
> > I'm using the av* form for historical reasons, but I'd prefer lav* one if
> > that was only up to me.
>
> Personally, I prefer av*. The main reason is that it takes an extra
> fraction of a second for me (used to be ~ 1 second before) to process
> lavf vs lavfi as opposed to avformat vs avfilter - I get slightly
> confused between the more similar lavf and lavfi.
>
> Anyway, I don't really mind any solution: stick with the
> inconsistency, move to the short forms, or move to the long forms.
> Note that with Libav using the lav* form, it will never be consistent if we don't follow them. -- Clément B.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
