Le nonidi 9 frimaire, an CCXXIV, Ganesh Ajjanagadde a écrit : > I agree with this. There is another comment I would like to make on > this note, related to a patch I have shelved for the moment: > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2015-November/182802.html - > it would be quite annoying to add a comment regarding acceptance of M, > G, etc suffixes to each and every filter.
Interesting point. After some thought, I think the matter of internal links would need to be considered very carefully, but I think that, if done carefully, a documentation system directly connected to the options system would take care of this and much more: basically, any option would automatically have a link to the description of the syntax for its type. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
