On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:20:08PM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > On date Tuesday 2015-11-17 17:12:46 +0100, wm4 encoded: > > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:00:29 +0100 > > Stefano Sabatini <stefa...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > > No, just in case ret == AVERROR(EAGAIN), in all other failure cases it > > > will exit the loop immediately. > > > > > > BTW, the same problem affects some API usage examples. > > > > Yeah, I got that wrong - but even with EAGAIN, is there a guarantee? > > I don't know. Note that this is also the same strategy applied by > ffplay and ffmpeg (in this case it will wait with a usleep). We could > abort in case a threshold count value is reached, but that would be > probably overkill.
iam not aware of any inf loops with EAGAIN [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
