On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 08:18:36PM -0500, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde >> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > [...] >> >> Nothing new here, just moved the copyright to the top of the file to >> satisfy some legal requirements I am completely unaware of, don't know >> why an inline copyright does not work. Anyway, I don't want to spam >> the ML with this kind of boring stuff, but Carl has objections to the >> patch until the legal stuff is sorted out. > > the patch LGTM but iam a developer not a lawyer ;)
Will give Carl another day (he was on vacation, don't know if he is back), but I don't think it is worth waiting beyond that - all important legal aspects are covered: boost license for relevant function which must explicitly be there verbatim, and copyright notice. Where to place them is really secondary - I have seen FOSS projects with such copyright given "inline" if it is for a single function. > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us > and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what > is excellent in them. -- Plutarch > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
