On 11/06/2015 05:37 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sebastien Alaiwan < > sebastien.alai...@allegrodvt.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The attached patch fixes an issue with the superframe index parsing. >> Please find attached a VP9 IVF stream showing the issue (if you try to >> remux it to webm). >> The gist of the problem is that the vp9 superframe parser seems to expect >> at least two frames inside the superframe. > > This is not OK, you rewrote the full parser and it looks like you simply > copied the libvpx code. I did not. I simplified the flow of control of the existing code. Would it be a problem anyway?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
