Hi, On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:11 AM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:30:26 -0400 > "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Michael Niedermayer > <mich...@niedermayer.cc > > > wrote: > > > > > either way, this subject is rather uninterresting ill try to do > > > something more usefull for FFmpeg than arguing about these > > > hypothetical cases ... > > > > > > +100. > > > > Many of these tools are like -Wpedantic. Reminds me of my rants about > > helgrind. > > I still don't think expecting the compiler to treat all memory accesses > as volatile and/or weak atomic accesses is going to work out. These are two extremes. What we're looking for is tools that find bugs. I've brought this up before so I apologize for repeating myself (I've explained this to the tsan guys also), but I'd really prefer if tsan was rewritten entirely to be like Microsoft Chess. Infinitely more useful, and all bugs are real (like valgrind/asan). Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
