On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote: > Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanag <at> mit.edu> writes: > >> Since you seem to be an "expert" on what things >> affect this decade, why don't you spend 5 minutes >> trying to outline to beginners like me what is >> "actually important" in your view? > > Important is whatever you want to work on. > That can be DTS-XLL or any random ticket or a > new format or a new decoder or a new filter.
Then by definition the int = 64 bits is something that has some importance. The fact that Michael asked about it, and I am interested to some (minor) degree confirms this according to your definition. > > But if the new format or the new decoder is an > invention of you it is less likely to find fans > (but see a64). > > (And consider to remember that if people do not > comment it does not always mean they agree, so > don't shoot those who do comment even if you > don't like it.) I have not "shot" anybody, just paid back in the same manner of tone. I will refrain from it in future, thanks. > > Carl Eugen > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
