On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 07:26:04PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> This one should not trigger any warnings, but will be useful for future >> robustness. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> --- >> libavutil/audio_fifo.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/libavutil/audio_fifo.h b/libavutil/audio_fifo.h >> index d93be2a..24f91da 100644 >> --- a/libavutil/audio_fifo.h >> +++ b/libavutil/audio_fifo.h >> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ AVAudioFifo *av_audio_fifo_alloc(enum AVSampleFormat >> sample_fmt, int channels, >> * @param nb_samples new allocation size, in samples >> * @return 0 if OK, or negative AVERROR code on failure >> */ >> +av_warn_unused_result >> int av_audio_fifo_realloc(AVAudioFifo *af, int nb_samples); > > probably ok > strictly speaking one could check the size after the call instead of > the returb value i think
I guess so, but that is an unusual use as far as I can tell. Will leave it up to someone else before pushing. If no one replies in the next 48 h, I will push. > > [...] > -- > Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB > > It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
