On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde > <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Commit dbb03b8e47f905f0f7b10c3eb5ac11f9bfc793ff renamed loop to >> stream_loop. This documents the change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> --- >> doc/ffmpeg.texi | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg.texi b/doc/ffmpeg.texi >> index 5624930..de49618 100644 >> --- a/doc/ffmpeg.texi >> +++ b/doc/ffmpeg.texi >> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ Overwrite output files without asking. >> Do not overwrite output files, and exit immediately if a specified >> output file already exists. >> >> -@item -loop @var{number} (@emph{input}) >> +@item -stream_loop @var{number} (@emph{input}) >> Set number of times input stream shall be looped. >> >> @item -c[:@var{stream_specifier}] @var{codec} >> (@emph{input/output,per-stream}) >> -- >> 2.6.1 >> > > this is trivial, will push within next 1 hour if no one objects.
pushed. Please let me know if such things are ok or not in the future - technically I guess doc maintainers need to respond before I can push, but as this change was trivial I thought I would do it. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel