On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Henrik Gramner <hen...@gramner.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I wonder if some compilers will complain that this overflows (strictly >> speaking it does) and that it should be -0x80000000 instead? > > -0x80000000 isn't a valid 32-bit integer in C. For this reason > INT32_MIN is usually defined to something like (-0x7fffffff -1).
Indeed, see e.g: "There are no negative integer literals. Expressions such as -1 apply the unary minus operator to the value represented by the literal, which may involve implicit type conversions." (from http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/integer_literal). Should we go ahead with the INT32_MIN then? > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
