On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 5:00 PM, James Darnley <james.darn...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-27 17:43, Stefano Sabatini wrote: >> On date Sunday 2015-09-27 15:28:50 +0200, James Darnley encoded: >>> On 2015-09-27 14:37, Stefano Sabatini wrote: >>>> + <p> >>>> + TNS still needs some polishing, but has the potential to reduce coding >>>> + artifacts by applying noise shaping in the temporal domain (something >>> ^^^^^^^^^ >>> artefacts >> >> I think both "artifact" and "artefact" are valid, but fixed. > > After consulting some references I have discovered that "artifact" with > an 'i' is the usual American spelling. Sorry about the noise.
If we are indeed following American spelling, then I missed something - somewhere "colour" should be "color". This one is a relatively more serious one to consider (although both are minor nits), since http://grammarist.com/spelling/artefact-artifact/ shows that both were used in the UK until recently. > > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
