On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:41:44AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to suggest a poll for the community in order to define some more > clear directions for the project. I plan to post the poll on the mailing > lists and IRC, people are free to forward them elsewhere. > > If anyone has a suggestion for a free & simple online poll, I'm listening. > A poll system where people can pick the importance of each entry would be > perfect. > > Here is the poll suggestion: > > Evaluate in the following list what is important and what isn't for > you in the FFmpeg project: > > - More bug fixes (please [+] them in the bug tracker) > - More test coverage to prevent regressions > - More "simple" features (new demuxers, new options, ...) > - More "advanced" features (high level API, scripting language > binding, filters rethinking, ...) > - More speed optimizations
> - Better releases (LTS, more backports, ...) i am not sure LTS shouldnt be a point of its own > - Overall cleanups (merge redundant decoders or dead/clumsy stuff) > - More API changes > - Less API changes > - Better API documentation (please specify) > - Better command line documentation (please specify) > - Other (please specify) > > I'd like to submit the poll by the end of next week. Comments on how to > improve this list are very welcome, as well as my initial request about a > poll system to use. - Support old API for longer [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
