Hi, On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:55 PM, compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:21:22 +0200 > Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:27:47PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > > > This "decision" thingy, is intended to confirm that > > > > * Stuff should be moved to the telepoint server, possibly > > > > duplicates should be left at/moved to the hetzner server for > > > > redundancy, if this is technically possible (maybe it should be > > > > called copy instead of move in that case) > > > > > > As discussed at VDD15 and posted to the admin IRC and emailed to the > > > root email address: > > > It was agreed by a large group of developers that this should be put > > > on hold and videolan remain a valid option. > > > > > > > Well, to be completely honest, it was Ronald & you mainly, the rest > > of the people in the room remained mostly silent, and it was about "a > > random server in Hungary [or sth like this] no ones know anything > > about". > > i agree with clement's assessment. i was the one who asked kieran to > include root@ffmpeg when asking about hosting. i'm not even sure what > their objections to bulgarian hosters were. aside from not knowing who > they were. > > i'm not here to make trouble, i'm not the one doing the work. i dont > care if we use videolan or bulgarian hoster. So I'm one of the concerned ones. I prefer caution simply because we do indeed not know them. Since other options exist (and are currently in use), I don't see the rush in moving away from our current "safe state". Kieran asked repeatedly if others were OK with this objection (where I was indeed the only one going along with him) or if anyone objected explicitly to such a statement (where there was complete silence - repeatedly). Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
