Hi, On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The randomize_buffer() implementation assures that "most of the time", > we'll do a good mix of wide16/wide8/hev/regular/no filters for complete > code coverage. However, this is not mathematically assured because that > would make the code either much more complex, or much less random. > --- > tests/checkasm/vp9dsp.c | 147 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 147 insertions(+) Poke. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
