On 09/14/2015 12:25 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > the encoder chooses the lowest version that supports the requested > features well to maximize compatibility
Thanks for the explanation. Sounds reasonable. If I read [1] correcly, FFV1.0 does not store "bits_per_raw_sample". I'd be interested in any downsides FFV1.0 would have over FFV1.1? Thanks, Pb == References: [1] http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/ffv1.html#toc-Subsubsection-4.3.1 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
