On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 10:53:15AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote: > >> Doesn't this have overflow issues? > >> More precisely, are you sure this behaves correctly when the int > >> reconnect_delay wraps around? > > > > i intend to add a reconnect_max that limits reconnects and prevents > > overflow, just wanted to first make sure noone has objections to > > these 2 patches before i write more code on top > > These 2 patches are OK for me.
applied > > BTW: > Is it OK to expose generic io_callback in URLContext > to API users to handle such staffs? > Something like open_cb in AVFormatContext. > > API users may need various check/action at reconnection, > e.g. checking cellular/wifi, renewing expired url, > injecting custom IO into nested protocols, alert end user. sounds like it would make sense but i dont know what the other devels oppinion about that is ... thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
