On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:43 PM, James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/4/2015 6:19 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> James Almer <jamrial <at> gmail.com> writes: >>>>> Isn't removing these two going to break >>>>> compatibility with libav? >>>> >>>> (ABI or API?) >>>> I don't think so but I absolutely may miss something. >> >>> ABI, you're removing elements from the middle of the >>> struct. >> >> In which situation would that be an issue? >> >> Carl Eugen > > Figured that since direct access is apparently allowed for elements > above ts_id it would be an issue for applications built with libav > that then use ffmpeg's lavf at runtime. > > Disregard this if that's not the case.
We are not really ABI compatible, and its not a goal worth going after. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
