On 7/28/2025 4:40 PM, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 4:21 PM Michael Niedermayer
<mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
Hi
regression: issue aaddresses a regression
bug: something is not working
This is inconsistent
Label X cannot sometimes mean "X is removed" and "X is added"
bug seems meaning that the PR adds a bug
regression seems meaning that the PR removes a regression
IMO this should be done consistently
a PR can have bugs and it can fix bugs
a PR can cause regressions and it can fix regressions
so lets rename the labels to bug_fix, regression_fix and add has_bug
and has_regression. The former two colored green, the latter two
colored red.
Issues also need labels, and there "bug" and "regression" are fine,
indicating that an issue flags a bug instead of, e.g., a feature
request (and applying bug+regression makes sense).
Every PR is also an issue, labels apply to both.
So for an issue, the label would imply that it reports a bug or
regression, and for a PR that it fixes it respectively.
Having two split labels for that seems a little unnecessary.
Or we could just not use the bug/regession label on PRs, cause they do
seem kinda off there.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
