Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanag <at> mit.edu> writes: > >> > The encoder produces conforming and - if requested - > >> > lossless files, it should not be marked experimental imo.
> Sorry for the late comment, but I see quite a > few tickets related to jpeg2000 on trac (e.g > 4653, 4679, 4669, 4601). You forgot ticket #4610 which I suspect is the most important one. I completely agree with you that marking the jpeg2000 decoder might have been premature! (But beware: You have just found another dangerous minefield!) My patch in this thread is about the jpeg 2000 encoder that needs a lot of memory but produces - to the best of my knowledge - valid lossy and lossless files . Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
