Servus Manuel

On Wed, Jun 04, 2025 at 10:06:28PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> Servus Michael,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 1:00 PM Michael Niedermayer
> <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 12:30:40PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote:
> > > Servus Michael,
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 12:51 AM Michael Niedermayer
> > > <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > >              /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours 
> > > > > > > */
> > > > > > > -            if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= 
> > > > > > > maxpxo)
> > > > > > > +            if (((pxoff - p + 0) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= 
> > > > > > > maxpxo)
> > > > > > >                  || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= 
> > > > > > > maxpxo)
> > > > > > >                  || (i == 0) || (j == 0))
> > > > > > >                  continue;
> > > > >
> > > > > Oops, yes, that change is correct.
> > > >
> > > > will apply
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I think you should just rip the whole block-smoothing block out
> > > > > entirely: it creates a "sawtooth" pattern
> > > > > which is more annoying than the "blockiness" it tries to soften.
> > > >
> > > > probably, but i just wanted to fix the out of array access,
> > > > ill leave improvment beyond that to others
> > >
> > > Is it OK if I just remove this block entirely?  I'd commit that along
> > > with the other 2 sanm patches I have.
> >
> > i think you dont understand the bug my change is fixing
> >
> > Its an out of array access in:
> >                 for (k = 0; k < 4; k++)
> >                     *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst + 
> > pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) & 0x7f;
> >
> > The hunk:
> >             /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours */
> >             if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo)
> >                 || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= maxpxo)
> >                 || (i == 0) || (j == 0))
> >                 continue;
> >
> > skips this code. If the hunk is removed and nothing else is changed
> > its MORE buggy as there will be more out of array accesses
> 
> I was thinking about this:
> 
> diff --git a/libavcodec/sanm.c b/libavcodec/sanm.c
> index 00bfef00fe..5912a8c14b 100644
> --- a/libavcodec/sanm.c
> +++ b/libavcodec/sanm.c
> @@ -732,25 +732,6 @@ static int old_codec4(SANMVideoContext *ctx,
> GetByteContext *gb, int top, int le
>                 }
>                 pxo2 = pxo2 - 4 + p;
>             }
> -
> -            /* smooth top and left block borders with neighbours */
> -            if (((pxoff - p + k) < 0) || ((pxoff - p + k) >= maxpxo)
> -                || ((pxoff + 3 * p) < 0) || ((pxoff + 3 * p) >= maxpxo)
> -                || (i == 0) || (j == 0))
> -                continue;
> -            if (param & 0x80) {
> -                for (k = 0; k < 4; k++)
> -                    *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst
> + pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) | 0x80;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p - 1)) >> 1 | 0x80;
> -            } else {
> -                for (k = 0; k < 4; k++)
> -                    *(dst + pxoff + k) = ((*(dst + pxoff + k) + *(dst
> + pxoff - p + k)) >> 1) & 0x7f;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 1 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 1 * p - 1)) >> 1;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 2 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 2 * p - 1)) >> 1;
> -                *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) = (*(dst + pxoff + 3 * p) +
> *(dst + pxoff + 3 * p - 1)) >> 1;
> -            }
>         }

ahh, yes thats fine

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Into a blind darkness they enter who follow after the Ignorance,
they as if into a greater darkness enter who devote themselves
to the Knowledge alone. -- Isha Upanishad

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to