> On Jun 1, 2025, at 01:40, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 31 May 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
>> This allows adjusting them to exactly match whatever is fastest on
>> a given CPU for each type.
>
> Did you use some tool to make this patch, or it was just manual work?
>
> Can't you use C11 generics to make this somewhat automatic?
doc/developer says "for the public headers which must stay C99 compatible."
>
> And if we are introducing something new, do we really want to stick to
> MIN/MAX macros which possibly evaluate their argument multiple times? It was
> always an issue, so I would love to see us moving away from it.
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
