On Mon, 26 May 2025 01:50:42 +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > Why should the FFV1 specification crowd object to us writing FFV1 files > in the way they have been intended to be written since February 2017 > (since > https://github.com/ietf-wg-cellar/matroska-specification/commit/51a600106bfa66f58a7f2c8e05fab091ab059ebd)? > Anyway, I cc'ed Dave Rice, the author of the aforementioned commit.
thanks for cc'ing dave, waiting for dave's response, and thanks to dave for the quick reply, review and OK. i know ffv1 users are all about bitexact-ness, and i didnt know when Dave's timers were ready for this change either. thanks everyone. and i hope that you dont think i'm trying to slow down or block any changes to default ffmpeg improvements. i just wanted to be inclusive of ffv1 users opinions, and now we're set! :) maybe i'd change commit message from avformat/matroskaenc: Use native id instead of VfW for FFV1 to avformat/matroskaenc: Use native id V_FFV1 instead of V_MS/VFW/FOURCC/FFV1 if you think its appropriate anyway. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
