On 08/30/2015 07:33 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 8/30/15, Peter B. <p...@das-werkstatt.com> wrote: >> This will produce quite a number of tests :( >> I guess it is desired to keep the number of tests as low as necessary? > Not at all. Just look at ffv1 coverage at coverage.ffmpeg.org
:) I'd love to add tests for FFV1 to increase the coverage as much as possible. So, in order to avoid silent regressions in less-common combinations, I've added very detailed test-scenarios (as shown in my "ffv1.mak") previously. Except for a few other codecs (e.g. h264), most only have a handful of tests. So I thought my suggested test-suite was overkill. I'd like to keep the tests as much as necessary, but as little as possible. Regards, Pb _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
