Hi sw On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 05:56:06PM +0000, softworkz . wrote: [...]
> > But i certainly was and am open to talk with paul. > > I'd make at least an attempt before going the hard way. I intended to wait for him to contact me, but sure ill mail him first then > > > > > And when you really need something, you can still cherry-pick it anyway. > > > > but we dont really contaminate anything with GPL code > > Okay, so if all this will just remain in "almpeg" with GPL - what's the > benefit? > He appears to be updating regularly from FFmpeg, so if I would want > FFmpeg + his work under GPL - then I could use his project directly - no? in what you write, replce GPL by LGPL as in: > He appears to be updating regularly from FFmpeg, so if I would want > FFmpeg + his work under LGPL - then I could use his project directly - no? I mean, you seem to think this argument doesnt work if the license is LGPL why would it be different with the GPL? thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB There will always be a question for which you do not know the correct answer.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
