On 5/6/2025 6:26 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
x87 float instructions are not used in x86_64, which is both these targets. For float16 it will either use CPU instructions if available, or the fallback we have using a lookup table (through float2half and half2float).On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 06:10:22PM -0300, James Almer wrote:On 5/6/2025 5:44 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 04:44:06PM -0300, James Almer wrote:Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> --- tests/fate/image.mak | 3 +++ tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-floatdiff --git a/tests/fate/image.mak b/tests/fate/image.mak index 042cf6438f..abf204f69f 100644 --- a/tests/fate/image.mak +++ b/tests/fate/image.mak @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ fate-exr-rgb-scanline-pxr24-float-12x8: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/ FATE_EXR += fate-exr-rgba-multiscanline-half-b44 fate-exr-rgba-multiscanline-half-b44: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgba_multiscanline_half_b44.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrapf32le +FATE_EXR += fate-rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float +fate-rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgb_scanline_dwab_half_float.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrpf32le + FATE_EXR += fate-exr-rgb-scanline-float-b44 fate-exr-rgb-scanline-float-b44: CMD = framecrc -i $(TARGET_SAMPLES)/exr/rgb_scanline_float_b44.exr -vf scale -pix_fmt gbrpf32le diff --git a/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float b/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a5a1997785 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +#tb 0: 1/25 +#media_type 0: video +#codec_id 0: rawvideo +#dimensions 0: 512x512 +#sar 0: 1/1 +0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0xbb11b00adiffernt result here: (on linux x86-64) --- ./tests/ref/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float 2025-05-06 22:40:40.017406113 +0200 +++ tests/data/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float 2025-05-06 22:40:53.297513198 +0200 @@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ #codec_id 0: rawvideo #dimensions 0: 512x512 #sar 0: 1/1 -0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0xbb11b00a +0, 0, 0, 1, 3145728, 0x2a15f7aa Test rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float failed. Look at tests/data/fate/rgb-scanline-dwab-half-float.err for details.Yeah, I can reproduce it, and even if i add "sws_flags +accurate_rnd+bitexact" i get the same results (0xbb11b00a on Win64, 0x2a15f7aa on Linux x86-64). I also get a different hash in both targets if i don't rescale to gbrpf32, so the problem is not in swscale. Neither Valgrind or gcc-usan complain, so I'm not sure what could be producing this difference.float is not bitexact in C, and float on x86 might use old x87 style while x86-64 might be SSE*/AVX, so if theres any float in the code slight differences can happen, no idea if half float in this case is affected by this or not
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".