On 24.08.2015 13:44, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On 28/07/15 15:41, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>> On 28/07/15 15:30, Vittorio Giovara wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> doc/APIchanges | 14 +++++++------- >>>>> libavcodec/version.h | 6 +++--- >>>>> libavdevice/version.h | 4 ++-- >>>>> libavfilter/version.h | 4 ++-- >>>>> libavformat/version.h | 4 ++-- >>>>> libavresample/version.h | 4 ++-- >>>>> libavutil/version.h | 4 ++-- >>>>> libswscale/version.h | 2 +- >>>>> 8 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > I believe to see general consensus towards applying the set as is.
There is no consensus for that. > I've added a skeleton to the wiki > (https://wiki.libav.org/Migration/12) so that we can properly document > the necessary changes before we release. Any help with that is of > course welcome. I have a work-in-progress API-porting-guide. > If no objections I'll push this set in the following days. Can you explain why you believe it makes any kind of sense to remove widely used APIs like FF_API_PIX_FMT/FF_API_AVCODEC_FRAME, while keeping completely useless ones like FF_API_MISSING_SAMPLE? I think it would be much more reasonable to keep the two I suggested, and instead remove most of those you intend to keep, because they are hardly used anywhere. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
