Hello everybody,

working on the subject of writing out filtergraph information obviously implies 
the goal of being able to visualize that data in some way. While I do have 
something for long, it's tailored for specific workflows and is hardly useful 
for most.
Anyway, it shouldn't be required to use once another software for visualize the 
output. This decimates the usability for any such feature by far.
Few days ago, I was thinking about ways for making this feature really useful 
for everybody without needing to jump through any extra hoops. We have that 
range of writers (now "text formatters"), and so I wondered whether there isn't 
some text format that is meant to directly represent a graph for visualization, 
which finally reminded me about


MERMAID

Had used it just twice or thrice on GitHub for simple things, and as I found 
out later, it's by far less capable than I would have expected (more than a 
decade of age, current version 11.x) --- but: it has a number of unique selling 
points:

- The format is simple and transparent
- It's hand-editable and easily readable
- There's quite an ecosystem around it with many integrations and tools 
available
  The #1 for me though is:
- It goes hand-in-hand with Markdown
  => almost everywhere Markdown is supported, Mermaid diagrams are supported as 
well

Practically, this means that you can paste a Mermaid diagram into any message 
field on GitHub (for example; forgejo supports it as well as many others) - and 
the diagram is rendered automatically with a kind of interactive viewer.
Enough reason to give it a try and I also had some quick success. Writing that 
format fits rather well into the logic of the existing text formatters without 
major changes.
That way I ended up with a new 


avtextformatter_mermaid ("mermaidwriter" in old terminology)

Most of the mentioned deficiencies could be remedied by CSS styling (even 
though it's been really tedious). 
Now well - when viewing filtergraphs, you often want to know details about the 
input and output streams. For that other tool I was parsing out this 
information from the ffmpeg log lines describing the streams on startup. But 
this work is happening right at the source of information, so I added 
input/output files and streams to the filtergraph printing as well (just as 
much detail as needed for graphing).
The unthankful effect: by that, it became apparent that something else is 
missing: encoders and decoders - added those as well and eventually got 
reasonable results.
Remained one last part:


Usability

Of course, it's still not a great experience when you need to copy/paste the 
generated diagram code in some web portal. To solve that, I've created once 
another textformatter(writer): mermaidhtml.
It's just an extension to the Mermaid formatter which wraps the diagram as an 
html file for local viewing (yet not fully offline).
The final idea would be to simplify usage as much as possible, so that all you 
need to do is adding a small option to the Ffmpeg command line, like -sg ('show 
graph') which would cause Ffmpeg to create such mermaid html file on exit and 
automatically launches the browser (if any) to view that file. 
While working or trying a range of commands, after another, this will also 
create a browser tab for each run, allowing for easy comparison between recent 
commands.


Examples

I've created a Gist with some examples of the output here:

https://gist.github.com/softworkz/a196b2d0e9e2df49f766abd92f508551

(also includes a zip with html file examples)



Questions

I'm curious what you think about it!

- What's good, what's bad, what should be changed/improved?

- What about the displayed information, should something be added?

- I'm folding out the buffer source/sink filters to simplify the view, is that 
ok?
  Should the TRIM filters be excluded as well?

- Since it's no longer just about filter graphs - what do you think about the 
term
  "Ffmpeg Execution Graph"?
  (other ideas welcome)

- Does anybody have some complex command lines for me to test?
  (no need to include media files, I can try to replicate 
  something similar)


Thanks,
sw







_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to